|
The knowledge bank for Employment includes:
-
regular
updates on the latest legal developments;
-
our newsletter,
Employment Eye, reviewing in detail the
key legal issues that affect your
organisation;
- our
'Alert' service, with details of major
developments in employment law; and
-
details of forthcoming seminars and
events.
Employment Eye (April 2008) Putting a
stop to swinging the lead
Most workplaces have one: the employee
who either exaggerates illnesses or
dishonestly takes time off work with
suspect ailments. These are commonly
known as ‘malingerers’ and dealing with
them can be tricky. However, as Lisa
Norman reports, there are various
tactics available for tackling this type
of problem employee
Employment Eye (April 2008) Minimal
requirements for step one grievance
letters
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has
looked at the statutory dispute
resolution procedures and has, again,
set the bar very low in respect of the
requirements for a valid a step one
grievance letter, as Raj Basi explains.
Employment Eye (April 2008) News round-up
The employment arena has been as busy as
ever, and Mugni Islam-Choudhury reports on
the latest news and developments of which
you need to be aware this month.
Employment Eye (March 2008) Discrimination
and harassment round-up
The scope of employees’ protection from
discrimination and harassment has been
considered, and narrowly interpreted, in
three recent key decisions. Sarah Lamont
considers how the employment law land lies
following this trio of cases.
Employment Eye (March 2008) Unilateral
variations to contract
If a contractual change is imposed on an
employee and they agree to it but “under
protest”, is it fair to dismiss them if they
then insist on working to their original
contract? Nicola Stibbs reports.
Employment Eye (March 2008) News round-up
April may be the cruellest month, but it is
also, traditionally, one of two months of
the year during which the government
introduces legislative changes (the other
being October). This month’s news round-up,
reported by Alastair Currie, focuses on the
changes which will be taking effect in the
coming weeks.
Employment Eye (March 2008) Mock employment
tribunal
Details on our half and full day workshops
Employment Alert (February 5 2008)
Employment status of agency workers
Alert! The Court of Appeal has handed down
its judgment in James v London Borough of
Greenwich and held that long term agency
workers are not necessarily employees.
Employment Eye (February 2008) Alert!
Expired warnings can be taken into account
when making a decision to dismiss
In Airbus UK Limited v Webb, the Court of
Appeal reversed a decision of the Employment
Appeal Tribunal and said that, in certain
circumstances, it may not be necessary to
ignore spent warnings when making a decision
about whether to dismiss an employee. David
Widdowson sets out the details.
Employment Eye (February 2008) Tribunals
answering age old questions?
Age discrimination case law round-up
Sara Woffenden reports on four recent
decisions which shed some light on how
tribunals are approaching the Age
Discrimination Regulations.
Employment Eye (February 2008) Maternity
leave and sick pay
Marie-Claire Boyle considers a recent
decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal
which clarifies how employers should deal
with pregnancy related illness before,
during and after maternity leave, and also
whether policy documents stored on an
intranet page could be incorporated into an
employee’s contract of employment
Employment Eye (February 2008) News round-up
A summary of the latest news, events and
forthcoming changes in the employment field,
reported by Julian Hoskins.
Employment Alert (31 January 2008)
Important Advocate General's opinion on
disability discrimination
Employment Eye (January 2008) Alert! Opinion
of the Advocate General on holiday
entitlement during long term sick leave
The Advocate General has published his much
anticipated opinion in Stringer v HMRC
(previously known as Ainsworth v HMRC) on
whether employees on long-term sick leave
are entitled to holiday pay. Bethan Cobner
reports.
Employment Eye (January 2008) On the
horizon: key employment legislation and
cases in 2008
The coming year looks set to be just as busy
as 2007 in terms of legislative and case law
developments. Julian Hoskins looks at what’s
coming up.
Employment Eye (January 2008) Increases to
employment tribunal awards
The annual increases to the limits on awards
for claims in the employment tribunals take
effect from 1 February 2008. Sarah Maddock
sets out the details.
Employment Eye (January 2008) Employment
Bill 2007: proposed repeal of the statutory
dispute resolution procedures
The Employment Bill 2007 had its first
reading on 6 December 2007 and marks the
beginning of the end of the somewhat fraught
history of the statutory dispute resolution
procedures.
Employment Eye (January 2008) Equal pay
grievances
John Moore reports on an important decision
from the Employment Appeal Tribunal which
confirms that, in equal pay claims, an
employee’s comparator identified in their
grievance must substantially or materially
the same as the comparator identified in
their complaint to the Employment Tribunal.
Employment Eye (January 2008) Unfair
dismissal and ill health early
retirement
Fiona Killingworth considers a decision
of the Employment Appeal Tribunal which
confirms that a reasonable employer
should give proper consideration to an
ill-health early retirement scheme
before making a decision to dismiss an
employee for long-term sickness absence.
Employment Eye (December 2007) -
Spotlight on Unfair Dismissal Sarah Lamont looks at three recent cases
which clarify the approach the
employment tribunals are taking towards
claims of unfair dismissal.
Employment Eye (December 2007) - TUPE:
post transfer surprises When does an employee have to object the
transfer of their employment in a TUPE
transfer? Alec Bennett investigates.
Employment Eye (December 2007) Agency
workers - news round-up The benefits and legal protections
afforded to agency and temporary workers
are the subject of constant review and
judicial interpretation. Sara Touzel
considers recent key developments
-
Employment Eye (November 2007)
Redundancy and mobility clauses
In the context of a potential redundancy
situation, to what extent can an
employer rely on a contractual mobility
clause to avoid liability for redundancy
payments? Julian Hoskins reports on a
recent decision of the Court of Appeal.
-
Employment Eye (November 2007)
Collective redundancy consultation
Employers will be concerned by the EAT’s
ruling that they are under a duty to
consult collectively about the business
reasons for making redundancies. Fiona
Killingworth examines the implications
of the decision.
Employment Eye (November 2007)
Offsetting rolled-up holiday pay
Sarah Leverton questions whether
employers should rely on a case which
suggests that they may offset rolled-up
holiday payments against claims for
statutory holiday pay even where the
method of calculating the payments was
not set out in writing before the
employee started work.
-
Employment Eye (October 2007)
Investigating allegations of malingering
Sarah Michael considers a recent
decision of the EAT concerning the
sufficiency of an employer’s
investigation into the conduct of an
employee who was dismissed for
malingering.
Employment Eye (October 2007) DDA –
consultation as a reasonable adjustment?
The EAT has confirmed that an employer
is not required, as part of the duty to
make reasonable adjustments, to discuss
options for alternative work with a
disabled employee. Nevertheless, Mugni
Islam-Choudhury points out that there
are a number of potential pitfalls for
the employer who fails to consult.
Employment Eye (October 2007) Redundancy
– suitable alternative employment and
trial periods
When can a redundant employee, having
accepted alternative employment, change
his or her mind without losing the right
to a statutory redundancy payment?
Marie-Claire Boyle reports on a recent
decision of the EAT.
Employment Eye (September 2007)
Statutory dismissal procedures
Two recent decisions of the EAT have
shed light on the factors that tribunals
should take into account when assessing
the amount of the uplift for an
employer’s failure to follow the
statutory dismissal procedures. There
has also been some guidance on the
requirements for notifying an employee
of his or her right of appeal. Jodie
Sinclair reports.
Employment Eye (September 2007) New
guidance on personal data
There has been much uncertainty as to
what information amounts to an
employee’s “personal data” under the
Data Protection Act 1998. Sara Woffenden
examines new guidance issued by the
Information Commissioner, which departs
from the narrow interpretation
previously applied by the Court of
Appeal
Employment Eye (September 2007) Stress
claims – impact of employer’s conduct
Anne Palmer considers two recent Court
of Appeal cases concerning the scope of
an employer’s liability where an
employee is suffering from a
stress-related illness which the
employer has allegedly caused.
-
Employment Eye (September 2007) LGPS
update
Best Value Authorities Staff Transfers
(Pensions) Direction 2007. If you are
either a best value authority, such as a
local authority, or a private contractor
who contracts with best value
authorities, then this Direction will be
relevant to you.
Employment Eye (August 2007) Disability
discrimination – normal day-to-day
activities
The EAT has recently considered whether
a senior police officer’s dyslexia,
which impeded his performance in a
promotion exercise, had a substantial
adverse effect on his normal day-to-day
activities. Andrew Davidson reports.
-
Employment Eye (August 2007) Equal pay
round-up
Sarah Lamont considers the implications
of three key decisions of the EAT in the
field of equal pay. Issues that have
arisen in recent weeks include the
impact of a TUPE transfer on the time
limit for bringing an equal pay claim,
and whether a union had discriminated
against its female members by
negotiating a low settlement in respect
of their claims for back pay.
Employment Eye (August 2007) A right to
redeploy?
Katy Horner looks at a recent Court of
Appeal decision in which the question
was whether an employer was entitled to
withhold the wages of a teacher who
refused redeployment to a workplace
other than the one specified in her
employment contract.
-
Employment Eye (July 2007) Restrictive
covenants
Sara Woffenden considers a recent case
in which the Court of Appeal took a
refreshingly pragmatic approach to the
enforceability of a post-termination
non-dealing clause in a contract of
employment.
-
Employment Eye (July 2007) Increase in
statutory leave entitlement
The Government has estimated that 5.9
million workers will benefit from the
forthcoming increase to statutory leave
entitlement under the Working Time
Regulations. Caroline Havard reports on
the practicalities and pitfalls for
employers.
Employment Eye (July 2007) Ownership of
contacts lists
When an employee stores a list of personal
and business contacts on the employer’s
computer, to whom does that information
belong? Alastair Currie considers the
implications of a recent High Court ruling
and offers some advice on drawing up IT
policies.
Employment Eye (June 2007) Compromise
agreements – employee’s breach of warranty
If an employee breaches a warranty given as
part of a compromise agreement, can the
employer withhold a termination payment due
under that agreement? Tim Woodward considers
the High Court’s decision in Collidge v
Freeport plc.
Employment Eye (June 2007) Speaking off the
record The “without prejudice” rule
prevents the content of settlement
discussions between employer and employee
from being referred to as evidence in legal
proceedings. Katie Owen looks at two recent
cases which clarify the scope of the rule.
Employment Eye (June 2007) The new vetting
and barring scheme The vetting and
barring scheme, due to be introduced next
year, will protect children and vulnerable
adults by setting up a streamlined system of
registration for individuals who wish to
work with such groups. Mike Smith reports on
the new obligations imposed on employers.
Employment Eye (June 2007) Returning from
maternity leave Beth Cobner looks at
the recent case of Blundell v The Governing
Body of St Andrew’s Catholic Primary School,
in which the EAT considered exactly what
“job” an employee is entitled to return to
after maternity leave.
Employment Eye (May 2007)
Disability discrimination – scope of duty to
adjust Is an employer required, as
part of the duty to make reasonable
adjustments, to take steps such as
consulting the employee about possible
adjustments or obtaining a medical report?
David Widdowson examines the EAT’s latest
decision on this point.
Employment Eye (May 2007)
No ifs or butts
As from 1 July 2007,
England will become smoke-free. Rahim
Amarshi reports on the action points for
employers, which include putting up
no-smoking signs, devising smoking policies
and issuing guidance on whether staff are
permitted to smoke in company vehicles.
Employment Eye (May 2007)
An implied right to work overtime?
Raj Basi looks at the
recent case of
North Lanarkshire
Council v McDonald and anor, in
which the EAT considered whether employees’
contracts had been varied to include an
implied contractual right to carry out a
certain amount of paid overtime each week.
Employment Eye
(April 2007) Sick pay
policies and disabled employees
Julian Hoskins
examines the Court of Appeal's recent ruling
on whether the Disability Discrimination Act
1995 requires an employer to retain an
employee on full pay during long-term sick
leave.
Employment Eye (April 2007)
Bank holidays and part-time workers
The Court of Session has
decided that an employer’s refusal to give a
part-time employee pro rata entitlement to
bank holidays did not amount to
discrimination under the Part-time Workers
Regulations. Sara Woffenden reports
Employment Eye (April 2007)
DTI amends guidance on rolled-up holiday pay
Claire Cooke considers
the implications of the DTI's recent
amendments to its guidance on the Working
Time Regulations, which make it clear that
the practice of paying rolled-up holiday pay
is unlawful and must cease..
Employment Eye (April 2007)
Whistleblowing round-up
Sarah Leverton looks at three
recent cases which appear to have widened
the scope of the statutory protection
available to whistleblowers in the
workplace.
Employment Eye (March 2007) Whose ETO
reason?
Can a transferor in a TUPE situation carry
out pre-transfer dismissals relying on the
transferee’s economic, technical or
organisational (‘ETO’) reason? Sarah Lamont
looks at a recent Court of Session decision
that addresses this important issue.
Employment Eye (March 2007) TUPE: all
change?
Alec Bennett considers whether a recent
decision of the EAT gives employers any more
leeway to change terms of employment against
the backdrop of a TUPE transfer.
Employment Eye (March 2007) Unfair
dismissal: all is not lost
When an employer finds himself in the
unfortunate position of having carried out a
procedurally flawed dismissal, he may be
able to avoid liability for unfair dismissal
or obtain a reduction in compensation by
arguing that the dismissal would have
occurred in any event. Chloe Edwards gives
practical guidance
Employment Eye (March 2007) Grievances in
the spotlight
Jean Sapeta takes a look at some recent
cases that shed light on the scope of the
statutory grievance procedures.
Employment Eye (January 2007) Who's the
boss?
Recent
guidance from the EAT severely limits the
circumstances in which an agency worker can
claim to be an employee of the organisation
to which he or she is assigned. Andrew
Davidson considers the implications.
Employment Eye (January 2007) What's in
store for 2007?
The new year looks set
to keep HR managers busy dealing with a
number of important developments in
employment law. John Moore takes a look at
what's in store.
Employment Eye (January 2007) Increase to
employment tribunal awards
The annual
increase to the limits on compensation
awards takes effect from 1 February 2007.
Sarah Leverton sets out the details.
Employment
Eye (December 2006) Dismissing for
stress-related illness
Can an employer fairly dismiss an employee
who is absent with a stress-related illness
for which the employer is responsible? David
Widdowson considers a recent EAT case that
clarifies this issue.
Employment Eye (December 2006) Challenging
non-payment of bonuses
Raj Basi looks at two recent cases in which
employees raised novel arguments challenging
a refusal to award them bonus payments.
Employment Eye (December 2006) Grievance
procedures and tribunal time limits
Anne Palmer examines two cases in which the
EAT held that a grievance letter submitted
before the time limit for bringing a
tribunal claim had started to run was
sufficient to trigger the statutory
extension of the time limit.
Employment Eye (November 2006) Anti-social
hours bonuses held to discriminate against
women
Julian Hoskins
looks at a recent tribunal case on equal pay
that has serious implications for employers
who pay allowances for shift-work or
anti-social hours.
Employment Eye (November 2006) Enhanced
redundancy scheme was contractual
A recent Court
of Appeal decision raises a presumption that
enhanced redundancy schemes are
contractually enforceable. Sarah Leverton
examines what this means for employers.
Employment Eye (November 2006) Speaking off
the record
Chloe Edwards
considers the circumstances in which
supposedly “without prejudice” settlement
discussions can be relied on as evidence in
a discrimination claim.
Employment Eye (October 2006) Rewarding
length of service
The recent ruling of the European Court of
Justice on the use of length of service as a
criterion in pay scales has been misreported
in some sections of the media. Sarah Lamont
examines what it really means for employers.
Employment Eye (October 2006) When long-term
sickness meets disability discrimination
Sara Woffenden looks at three disability
discrimination cases that dispel some of the
myths surrounding the management of
long-term sickness absence.
Employment Eye (October 2006) DTI forced to
tighten guidance on rest breaks
A recent decision of the European Court of
Justice has prompted the Government to alter
its guidance on rest periods under the
Working Time Regulations. Jodie Sinclair
sets out the action points for employers.
Employment Eye (October 2006) Clandestine
recordings of disciplinary hearings
Caroline Havard considers the circumstances
in which employees can rely on unauthorised
tape recordings of disciplinary proceedings
as evidence in tribunal proceedings.
Employment
Eye - (September 2006)
Permission to
re-organise?
Do employers need the Tribunals to approve
their re-organisation in order for the
resulting dismissals to be fair? Ask Sarah
Lamont and Bethan Cobner.
Employment Eye - (September 2006)
Stress and
bullying - employers beware
Sarah Michael
looks at how work related stress and
bullying and harassment can give rise to
successful personal injury claims and claims
under the Protection from Harassment Act
1997.
Employment Eye - (September 2006)
New Guidance
on Religious Discrimination
The
Employment Appeal Tribunal has looked at
religious discrimination for the first time
and Alastair Currie considers what this
means for employers.
Employment
Eye - (July 2006) Discrimination Round Up
Sarah Lamont looks at a new challenge to the
Age Discrimination Regulations and the
discrimination issues currently keeping the
UK's courts and Tribunals busy.
Employment
Eye - (July 2006) Tupe or not Tupe?
Katy Horner
looks at a key House of Lords decision on
the timing of TUPE transfers and whether it
will now cause employers to think twice
before arranging secondments of staff.
Employment
Eye - (July 2006) Blowing the whistle on
post-employment discrimination
Will a recent Court of Appeal decision widen
the scope for whistle blowing employees to
claim victimisation long after their
employment has terminated? Writes Jacqui
Atkinson.
Employment Eye Update (June 2006)
Andrew Davidson comments on the recent
House of Lords
judgment in the long-running case of Celtec
v Astley
Employment Eye
(June 2006)
World Cup fever
As the World Cup is
upon us, David Widdowson looks at what
employers can do to cope with employees
afflicted by that familiar virus that
strikes workplaces once every four years.
Employment Eye (June 2006)
When is an agency worker
an employee?
Tim Woodward analyses a key decision from
the Court of Appeal which is likely to cause
yet more problems for employers who engage
staff via employment agencies.
Employment Eye
(June 2006)
Equal Pay on
the agenda
Following the introduction of Agenda for
Change, the NHS is currently facing an
onslaught of union backed equal pay
litigation and Raj Basi takes a look at what
employers can expect as more and more claims
filter through the system
Employment Eye (June 2006)
Collective redundancy consultation and
the stretchy elastic of compliance
The EAT has handed down a useful judgment
which considers employers' collective
redundancy consultation obligation, Beth
Cobner highlights how it could prove useful
for employers.
Local Government
Pension Scheme (LGPS) Update (March 2006)
This update is aimed at Local Authorities
and other public bodies and private bodies
(such as admissions bodies) who administer
and/or participate in the Local Government
Pension Scheme.
Employment Eye (March 2006) - Working
nine to five, what a way to make a
living
When is an 'on call' employee 'working'
under the Working Time Regulations? Alec
Bennett analyses a recent Employment
Appeal Tribunal decision which addresses
this often complicated question and also
looks at an unexpected change to the
Regulations.
Employment Eye (March 2006) - Planning
for a Pandemic
If a human strain of bird flu strikes
the UK it is predicted that 25% of the
population may be affected. The UK's
employers are now facing the prospect of
drawing up emergency plans to cope with
depleted staffing levels should the
pandemic strike. Sarah Lamont highlights
the key issues that employers need to be
aware of.
Employment Eye (March 2006) - A word of
warning!
Can employers rely on lapsed or expired
disciplinary warnings when deciding to
dismiss an employee? Will a dismissal be
unfair if the employer has not dismissed
employees for similar offences in the
past? Alastair Currie takes a look at
two recent decisions in which the these
questions are answered.
Employment Eye (February 2006) - TUPE -
what you need to know
The new Transfer of Undertakings
(Protection of Employment) Regulations
are due to come into effect on 6 April
2006. There are some welcome changes to
the draft Regulations which were
published by the DTI on 15 March 2005.
David Widdowson and Claire Cooke tackle
the key issues that employers need to
get to grips with.
Employment Eye (February 2006) - Foreign
affairs……
The House
of Lords clarifies the territorial scope
of the right to claim unfair dismissal -
The House of Lords has recently
re-opened the debate on the scope for
foreign employees or employees operating
abroad to claim unfair dismissal, but
have the already murky waters been
clouded even further, writes Katy
Horner.
Employment Update: Disability Discrimination
Act case round up (January 2006)
Employment Alert: Increase to employment
tribunal awards (December 2005)
Employment Update: statutory grievance
procedures. . .employers beware (December
2005)
Employment Alert: The Civil Partnership Act
2004 - be prepared! (September 2005)
Employment Update: NHS Update (August 2005)
Managing Long-Term Sickness Absence - Notes
from Kings College NHS Trust Seminar
Statutory
Dismissal, Disciplinary and Grievance
Procedures -
Notes from Kings College NHS Trust Seminar
Employment Update: Bonuses during maternity
leave. A pregnant pause? (May 2005)
Employment Alert - Court of Appeal ruling on
holidays and long term sick leave (May 2005)
Employment Eye April 2005 - Includes
articles on information consultation, new
employment tribunal rules, sexual
harrassment and 2004 Pension Act
Employment Alert: Draft TUPE
Regulations Published (March 2005)
Employment Update: Collective redundancies
(March 2005)
Employment Alert: Increase In Employment
Tribunal awards (January 2005)
Employment Update: Don't get in a fix -
January 2005
Employment Update: Legislation Round Up
(December 2004)
Please note: The information in
Knowledge is for guidance only. As every
legal issue has its own unique
characteristics, we always advise you to
check with us before taking action. |