Law firm Bevan Brittan has appointed two new partners to its growing Housing practice. Neil Brand and John Cox have both joined the firm from Clarke Willmott where they were partner and senior associate respectively. Neil Brand is based in Bevan Brittan’s London office and John Cox in Leeds.
Neil and John have a focus on housing management – assisting housing associations, private housing companies and local authorities with the management of their stock – and their appointments to Bevan Brittan means that the firm now has housing management partners in its offices in Leeds, London and Bristol.
Neil Brand is a long-established housing specialist. He was at Clarke Willmott for three years, prior to which he worked at Devonshires Solicitors. He specialises in leasehold matters and commonly works with social housing landlords, arm’s length management organisations, Registered Providers, and others.
John Cox has specialised in housing for most of his career. He was at Clarke Willmott for nearly three years, prior to which he worked at Walker Morris. He also worked in local government for ten years. Areas of specialism include contentious housing matters, advising landlords on such issues as breach of covenants, nuisance, possession and subletting.
Commenting on joining Bevan Brittan, Neil Brand said: “Bevan Brittan has an exciting vision for its Housing practice and has bolstered its team with highly experienced specialists who together can bring something new and offer bespoke and flexible solutions for clients. I am greatly looking forward to my time here.”
John Cox said: “I am delighted to have joined Bevan Brittan, which is a forward-thinking and progressive firm with a long-established presence in public sector and private markets. We want to help providers and landlords manage their portfolios successfully and get the best out of what they have.”
Bevan Brittan’s Head of Housing, Jonathan Turner added: “We are very pleased to have brought Neil and John on board. Giving us a ‘triangle’ of housing management partners, their arrival has boosted our housing management offering and given it national coverage. Along with their colleagues in the wider Housing practice, we are focused on growing a long-term sustainable team with increased capacity to help us service a growing client list.”
Duncan Weir, Managing Partner at Bevan Brittan, commented: “Housing is a key area of Bevan Brittan’s practice and with so many issues facing the sector, we are very focused on helping our clients negotiate all the uncertainties and achieve their strategic aims. I am delighted to welcome Neil and John to the firm after a successful year in which we have seen revenues continue to grow.”
Care co-ordinators and providers will be particularly interested in this decision from the Court, which sets out the undertakings and additional information required from trust corporations seeking to be appointed as property and affairs deputies.
Caridon Property Ltd v Monty Shooltz - gas safety certificates and Section 21 notices
The deadline for GDPR compliance is rapidly approaching. Crown Commercial Service (CCS) has published a Procurement Policy Note (PPN 03/17) reminding in-scope organisations of GDPR and data protection requirement in the context of public procurement.
On April 6, new regulations come into force that amend the gas safety regulations introduced in 1998. The Gas Safety (Installation and Use) (Amendment) Regulations 2018 are not aimed at reducing or relaxing safety standards, but to allow greater flexibility over when regular checks are carried out.
Bevan Brittan has been awarded a place on the legal panel of housing association Riverside, in an appointment that will take effect from April and run for a minimum of three years.
Employment Eye: Alert! Government responds to the Good Work Review
Bevan Brittan has acted as adviser to Brighton & Hove City Council in a £120 million joint venture (JV) with Hyde Housing to deliver 1,000 affordable new homes in the local area.
This case will be of interest to commissioners, providers and care co-ordinators in considering residence where P constantly expresses a wish to live elsewhere other than their current placement, no matter where they are placed. This case also considers reducing contact with family members where it is clear that more frequent plans for contact are having a serious adverse effect on P.