There’s always risk if you choose to strike out on your own.  But sometimes it’s worth it.

Like a lot of industry-wide pension schemes offering final salary-type benefits, the Social Housing Pension Scheme (SHPS) has been going through a difficult period. Changes to how housing associations report their SHPS pensions deficits over the last few years have brought the scale of deficits into sharp relief for many boards, and allowed direct comparisons with Local Government Pension Scheme deficits.

It’s not SHPS’s fault.  It has to provide public-sector pension benefits working with private sector funding and regulatory requirements. One of those private sector requirements is regular valuations and the 2020 valuation is currently underway.  One thing that the valuation calculates is any deficit in the Scheme – the difference between the funds it holds and the costs of providing promised benefits. 

SHPS has been in deficit for a long time.  Despite increasing employer contributions in recent years, the 2020 valuation is expected to show an increased deficit.  Coupled with this a number of employers have exited the scheme over recent years swapping increased control of risk factors for their pensions obligations for  greater uncertainty in  the face of regulatory change.

The increased deficit will mean increasing employer contributions once again further straining associations’ cash flow. SHPS’s actuaries have said that the part of employer contributions intended to pay off the deficit could increase by 50%.  That will hit employers in the Scheme hard at a time when their services, and their funds, have never been more needed.

Like many similar arrangements, the Scheme was set up to give employers in an industry access to high-quality pension provision, with generous benefits for employees.  It was administratively easier to do this collectively than going it alone, and it was hoped that larger schemes would deliver better investment returns and efficiency savings.

Unfortunately, this has not proved to the case for some time.  Existing employers have in many cases been forced to make some payments in respect of previous defaulting employers or orphan liabilities, and no matter what they do the cost of pensions only increases.

Stick or Twist?

Some employers have decided that despite the increased administrative and reporting responsibilities, and the ongoing liabilities they have to take on directly, it’s better to set up and run their own schemes.

This usually works by taking a ‘bulk transfer’ of the assets backing up the employer’s pension promise in the Scheme, and moving them to the employer’s new scheme. In simple terms the calculation is  the additional costs in setting up a new scheme and transferring the benefits are outweighed by longer term cost savings and greater flexibility .   

This means that there is no ‘exit debt’ to be paid, as would happen if the employer simply walked away from the Scheme.

The individual employer is then responsible for ensuring that benefits are properly funded until the very last member’s  benefits have been paid, or the new scheme is well enough funded that the responsibility can be passed to an insurance company, by ‘buying out’ the liabilities.  An employer can’t simply dictate how its own scheme will run and how much it will pay in.  But it can have a greater influence, working with the trustees to ensure that its costs and pension promises are affordable, and investment strategy does not expose the employer to greater risks.  None of this is available in SHPS.

Whether you are reviewing your options, looking to exit or considering next steps for dealing with your deficit the pension team at Bevan Brittan has a wealth of experience of  helping employers with these difficult issues  including the process of setting up your own scheme, and administering it once it’s up and running.

If you’re interested in exploring his further, please get in touch with Nigel Bolton or Philip Woolham



Our use of cookies

We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set optional analytics cookies to help us improve it. We won't set optional cookies unless you enable them. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences. For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page.

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytics cookies

We'd like to set Google Analytics cookies to help us to improve our website by collection and reporting information on how you use it. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone.
For more information on how these cookies work, please see our Cookies page.