Employment Eye

Welcome to ourDecember 2012edition of Employment Eye withthe latest onemployment law developments. In this issue we cover the following topics:The law of unintended consequences: TUPE service provision changesIf I've told you once, I've told you twice....a misconduct updateEmployment news round-up,December 2012

19/12/2012

person photo

Sarah Lamont

Partner

Welcome to our December 2012 edition of Employment Eye with the latest on employment law developments. In this issue we cover the following topics:

The law of unintended consequences: TUPE service provision changes

What happens if an outsourced contract expires and is brought back in-house to be run as a skeleton service, pending a new contractor being appointed to take over the outsourced contract? Would this amount to a ‘service provision change’ under TUPE, despite the fact that the client had never intended to run the service itself?  Sarah Lamont considers this question in the light of a recent decision from the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

Read the article

If I've told you once, I've told you twice....a misconduct update

John Moore reports on two recent decisions which provide useful, practical points on dealing with misconduct dismissals.

Read the article

Employment news round-up, December 2012

This month, the plums in our Christmas employment news pudding are: ‘law in a cold climate’ (dealing with severe weather related absence); next year’s statutory payment rates and limits; DH guidance on staff transfers; and an update on the review of the Public Sector Equality Duties. And Stop Press: government announcement on reduced redundancy consultation period.  Sarah Maddock reports.

Read the article

Related Insights

Snow and delays in construction contracts: What you need to know!

by Andrew Tobin

Heavy snow is forecast around the country over the weekend with up to 30 cm expected on higher ground. While this may bring...

Upper Tribunal decides that water companies are "public authorities"

by Virginia Cooper

The Fish Legal case has finally been concluded, with the Upper Tribunal ruling that the four water companies involved are indeed...

Liquidated damages

by Zara Rattray

An important pitfall to avoid

Consequences of not updating a payment schedule

Lessons from Balfour Beatty v Grove Developments [2016]

Guidance on the nature and scope of "mutual trust and cooperation"...

Costain Limited v Tarmac Holdings Limited [2017] EWHC 319 (TCC)

Keep up to date With Bevan Brittan

What interests you?

About you?

You can view our privacy policy here